Information Commissioners Office – List of Awareness Guidance documents

I made this FoI request to the ICO having come across a numbered awareness guidance document on the ICOs site.

Their response was a little confused, I thought, and I decided to clarify it here in my own words.

Firstly, they say the series has been discontinued, although some of them are still in play. In other words, they decided for some reason to replace some of them and not call the replacements “Awareness Guidance”. Fine.

Secondly, there used to be an index and they pointed me to it in the National Archives. But the old index only points to archived versions of the guidance. So I copied the relevant portions here below, and have edited it so that the guidance that is still relevant is linked from here while the no longer relevant stuff points to the archive. Hopefully I will be able to find the replacement documents and link them from here, which might make it all a whole lot clearer.

So in the list below, all the links point at the National Archives EXCEPT where it says “ICO” after the name. With this latter set, the link points at the current latest version on the ICO site.

Detailed specialist guides

 

 

Links from FoI Request

Awareness Guidance 5
[4]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
[5]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
Awareness Guidance 9
[6]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
Awareness Guidance 10
[7]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
Awareness Guidance 12
[8]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
Awareness Guidance 13
[9]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
Awareness Guidance 14
[10]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
Awareness Guidance 19
[11]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
Awareness Guidance 26
[12]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…
Awareness Guidance 27
[13]https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio…

Guide to Port Entry – innovation in print

Guide to Port Entry IS Innovation of the Year 2013

Guide to Port Entry IS Innovation of the Year 2013

I have been meaning to blog more often and really haven’t managed it. Good intentions and all that. But today I have a ‘real’ reason to blog so here goes. Last night at the PPA Digital Publishing Awards, our flagship publication Guide to Port Entry won the Innovation of the Year Award for 2013. Amid all the apps and websites and datafeeds of the UK digital publishing industry, a book was the most innovative entry. Sounds slightly mad, doesn’t it?

But it’s well deserved. The Guide has always been innovative, since our founder Colin Pielow put together the first edition from scraps of notes about ports he had been collecting. Back in 1971, no one was sure there would be a demand for a such a book, but Colin’s hunch proved correct. The 2nd Edition in 1973 added port plans and in 1975, the 3rd contained detailed information about Soviet-era Russian ports, the first western publication to do so.

Over the years, we at Shipping Guides have further expanded the Guide, adding hundreds of new ports and terminals to each subsequent edition, and broadening the scope of the information published. The shipping industry has recognised the quality and depth of the data by continuing to buy each new edition as it appears on the shelves.

And in mid-June 2012, as we prepared to put the 2013-2014 edition into production, we made a decision which has proved that there is still life in print media, despite the gloom and doom that has been spread by so called experts. We created thousands of QRCodes linked to our findaport.com digital platform and added one to each port in Guide to Port Entry. And by doing so, we enabled every reader of our flagship book to have immediate access to the latest information we hold about any port of their choice, just by scanning a QRCode on their phone.

QRCode to link to findaport.com

QRCode scanners are available for most modern mobile phones, free of charge in most cases. They are simple and easy to use. QRCodes can have a variety of information embedded within them including website links, emails, contact details, and more. More importantly, they are a proven technology and they work.

By embedding QRCodes in each port entry, we have given new life to a vintage edition. In this 21st century, our best selling book can continue to be used as a top quality reference source without the fear of being somehow dated. The latest information is always just a quick scan away.

And last evening, the UK publishing industry agreed with us. They named Guide to Port Entry – QRCodes as the 2013 PPA Digital Innovation of the Year at a packed dinner and awards ceremony in the City of London. And I was proud to accept the award. It’s been 40+ years in the making but the old girl deserves the recognition.

Tech development in school

It is generally agreed that there is a real need to move forward with coding4kids agenda now. We’ve done the talking, now is time for action. So my action pledge is to develop an idea for structural change at the top of educational foodchain.

My idea is to require that in every English school (the devolved governments can make their own structural change), one of the performance management (PM) targets for the headteacher, will have a technological focus. Every year.

The governing body of each maintained school appoints 2 or 3 of it’s members as the PM committee whose role is

  • to set 3 PM targets for the Head for the current year
  • monitor and evaluate the Head’s progress towards those targets
  • make recommendations to the GB at the end of the year about salary uplift for the ead

If we can get government to recognise the tech deficit, then surely an overall programme of tech awareness, understanding and adeptness will begin to pay dividends. And our schools can be the cradle for this innovation, just like they were when that first BBC Micro arrived at the school reception 30 years ago. But we will need some subtle pressure and oversight to ensure it happens. So the Heads PM rules need to be tweaked to give our headteachers one of the lead roles in driving the country forward.

The tweaking needs to ensure that at least one of the PM targets for every Head will have a tech development focus. But that doesn’t require us to turn every Headteacher into a geek. On the contrary, many schools will probably need to look at their own tech infrastructure and resources – including human resources – rather than at the tech curriculum. At least in the first instance.

So let’s outline some examples of possible targets as a starting point:

  • To undertake a tech skills and resources baseline assessment of the entire school community (pupils, staff, parents, local community, at school, at home, in public buildings) and to publish the results back to the whole community in a 21st century format within the current academic year
  • To partner with local businesses and community to start a Computer or Coding Club and ensure it appeals to a wide cross section of pupils, parents and staff before the spring half-term
  • To take school website maintenance in-house and reduce the cost of maintaining a web presence by 70% in the next financial year

Each of these examples are SMART. I’m sure the dev and activist communities can produce another 10 example SMART targets within 24 hours.

If the government can commit to making this change to the PM rules, then the quid pro quo from us would be to create a free support and advisory infrastructure for Heads and Governing Bodies to enable them to make this work. A starting point would be some simple wiki pages, but that will need to expand into a database of local geeks able and willing to lend a hand in devising appropriate targets and in measuring success. But the will exists to do that now, so lets harness it now.

Semantic Hackday Notes

This blogpost is liable to change rapidly. It should be treated as a work-in-progress

I’m at the Bright Lemon/Kasabi Open Government hackday today and thought that perhaps a blogpost about the day might prove to be a useful record of the day. After a set of round-the-tableintroductions, Leigh Dodds did a brief run through on Kasabi. This introduced the latest NHS datasets loaded onto Kasabi and their functionality.

Kasabi Default APIs

One of the most difficult things for me to get my head around were the 5 default APIs available for every Kasabi hosted dataset. I have linked to the documentation pages for each of these:

I also will discuss each of them below as I start to use and understand them.

SPARQL Endpoint

The SPARQL Endpoint for each dataset will provide access to a SPARQL  API Tester or Experimental API Explorer. It also links to any example SPARQL queries that have been defined for  a dataset e.g. List all UK Primary Care Trusts on some of the NHS data.

Dataset homepages

The homepage for each dataset shows a descriptive section above and, below, three tabs –

  • API – lists the APIs (including the default 5 above) available for a dataset
  • Explore – displays a list of ways that the data can be viewed (including the default “As linked data” layout  – the linked data void description default URL) –
  • Attribution – shows ways in which data or output can be attributed to Kasabi.

Getting started with SPARQL on Kasabi

In order to get started with a a dataset you can actually edit/play with some of the sample queries for a dataset, or, if there are no sample queries, try the following procedure (this procedure uses the CIA World FAct Book dataset):
  1. Open the dataset homepage
  2. Open the Explore tab and click on the “Browse as Linked Data” link in a new tab –
  3. This opens the ‘void description’ page for the dataset which is the default url for the linked data of the dataset and gives some very basic info about the dataset
  4. Go back to the API tab and click on the SPARQL Endpoint for the dataset
  5. Open the experimental API explorer for that dataset
  6. This allows writing some example queries

SPARQL Examples

On the ‘void description’ page, look for any definitions of vocabularies used. These will allow querying of the ‘types’ within the data. There are a couple of ways of doing this. Try this one – go to the experimental API explorer for the CIA dataset and type this in

PREFIX ns: <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/factbook/ns#>

SELECT ?s ?p ?o WHERE {
?p a ns:Country.
}

Running this will give a list of countries in the dataset. And this one will give the first 10 (‘LIMIT 10’) triples in the dataset

PREFIX ns: <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/factbook/ns#>

SELECT * WHERE {
 ?s ?o ?p .  
} LIMIT 10

These queries both specify a single vocabulary – PREFIX ns: <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/factbook/ns#&gt; They then define the data to be returned (‘?s ?p ?o’ and ‘*’) and follow that by defining which data they should be extracted from. Another useful SPARQL query would be the describe query. Try this:

PREFIX ns: <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/factbook/ns#>

DESCRIBE <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/factbook/resource/Ireland>

This query should be returning the equivalent of this CIA page about Ireland, or this page on the German source of the CIA data

The vocab used by Kasabi with this dataset can be seen here http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/factbook/page/Ireland This allows us to see a list of all the instances of a particular triple object such as this list of factbookcodes (these are in fact the FIPS_country_codes used by the US Federal government)

PREFIX ns: <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/factbook/ns#>

SELECT * WHERE {
 ?s ns:factbookcode ?p .  
}

Another query might be to find what objects are defined in the dataset. This one does that:

PREFIX ns: <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/factbook/ns#>

SELECT distinct ?o WHERE {
 ?s ?o ?p .  
} ORDER BY ?o

So, one of the next things you might like to do is to have that list as a separate URI. We can do that by creating an API on Kasabi.

Useful links

Note – GitHub:

There is a guthub user called kasabi (github.com/kasabi/kasabi-xsl) which can be used to add xsl files for transforming outputs in new APIs.

The “Michael Kay / Jeni Tennison / XML Summer School” Top XSLT Performance Tips

Michael Kay led a final afternoon Application Development Workshop at XML Summer School 2010, with Jeni Tennison in the front row.

The delegates were treated to a series of performance improvement tips from two of our leading XSLT practitoners.

I thought they were worth sharing more widely.

1. Use Keys

– No performance problem has ever been solved by NOT using keys.
– Learn to use and key()

2. Don’t use preceding:: when you mean preceding-sibling::

– And forget an index position i.e. preceding-sibling::p[1]

3. <xsl:variable/> – select vs value-of

– If you use <xsl:variable name-=”a”><xsl:value-of select=”node-a”/></xsl:variable> then stop. This is a very expensive unnecessary node creation operation.
– Use <xsl:variable name-=”a”  select=”node-a”/> instead.

4. Arithemetic

– In XSLT 2.0 think about using DOUBLE arithmetic, instead of DECIMAL arithmetic, especially on joins.

5. On the fly spreadsheets

– If generating on-the-fly stylesheets, e.g. in XProc pipelines, consider compile-time performance issues, which in other situations are probably not an issue.

6. Small Changes x Multiple Iterations = Poor Performance

– XSLT can have poor performance in a situation where multiple transforms, or iterations of the same transform, are changing small parts of a large source document. The overhead of multiple copying of large quantities of unchanged nodes may mean it would be preferable to choose a different technology. XQuery Update might be more suitable.

7. Profiling in XSLT (1)

– XSLT profiling is available in Saxon and is used by tools like Oxygen.

8. Profiling in XSLT (2)

– Subtractive Measurement can be used in profiling. If you are concerned about a particular part of your transform, you can measure the time cost by removing the operation and measuring again.

9. Benefits of typing

– Where possible you should use data typing in your schemas. It speeds up validation no end.

10.  minOccurs/maxOccurs

– If you use non-zero values in minOccurs/maxOccurs in your schemas, the larger the values then the slower the validation will be, because the parser will need to count the number of elements.
– So its much much quicker to validate minOccurs=1 than it is to validate minOccurs=101.

Linked data – there’s more … (as Jimmy Cricket used to say)

Ingrid Koehler recently posted a nice blog on Linked Data. Most of it I was aware of and subscribed to but there was one point which had never struck me. As I read it I had a DOH! moment thinking “… that’s so obvious, whay hadn’t I thought of it before!”.

It was her point 5:

Linked data does not have to be open data. Public services would benefit tremendously from using linked data formats. It means that we could stop spending resources on data aggregation and start spending it on analysis and action. Linked data can be used in secure settings to help partners share personal, sensitive or commercial information on performance and resources and help better target those in need or areas for improvement.

I just wonder if we can create tools to make it easier to convert data TO linked data formats, whether we would find more people publishing in those formats? You still need to be a bit of a geek to get data into Linked Data formats.

Amnesty vs FT and Shell

What a great ad from Amnesty Intl

Pity the FT wouldn’t run it!

%d bloggers like this: